Related Articles
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Shell's BG move is big on Asian gas

The takeover signals an expectation that natural gas in the Asian market will grow

As well as muscling into Brazil's deep-water oil play, Shell's $70bn move on BG Group is a big bet on the expanding market for natural gas in the Asia Pacific region. 

As the Anglo-Dutch supermajor takes over UK-based BG, it cements its dominant position in the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade, most of which flows into energy-hungry Asia.

The move is confirmation that Shell, along with some other members of the Big Oil family, firmly believes cleaner-burning gas will play a major role in meeting the energy demand of emerging economies, such as China and India. Before the merger was announced, BG was poised to become China's biggest LNG supplier with 8.6m tonnes per year (t/y) committed by 2017.  It also has a strong presence in India.

Still, Shell was always the biggest multinational company in the LNG business. Once the deal closes, it will be even bigger, controlling about 45m tonnes per year of LNG supply by 2017-18 - or roughly 20% of last year's output. The combined company with be a major LNG player, ranking a close second only to state-backed Qatar Petroleum as the globe's biggest seller of LNG. On top of this, the combined entity's LNG interests will be more than double the size of ExxonMobil's equity stakes.

The takeover re-energises Shell's LNG development pipeline, adding a leading US position, entry to East Africa, and new options to expand an already prominent presence in Australia and Canada, as well as an interesting position in Singapore - southeast Asia's emerging LNG trading hub. 

It will gain access to BG's big gas discoveries offshore Tanzania - that will be sold into Asia via a proposed LNG scheme - and also BG's recently commissioned 8.5m t/y Queensland Curtis LNG (QCLNG) export project in Australia.  

The deal is expected to deliver $2.5bn worth of synergies. A significant portion of those will be in Australia, where Shell has a large portfolio of coal-bed methane gas through its Arrow Energy joint venture with PetroChina. 


Arrow has large amounts of uncontracted gas - some 6,400 petajoules (PJ ) of proved plus probable reserves - enough to supply a single liquefaction train. And it recently abandoned plans to build its own LNG processing plant.

The merger could bring Arrow gas into QCLNG with a potential expansion a possibility, says Graeme Bethune, chief executive of Australian-based consultancy EnergyQuest.

A one-train expansion of QCLNG would be much cheaper than the first two trains. Also the gas transmission pipeline is sized for three trains, as are some of the upstream facilities.

"I would assume Shell is getting a good deal, particularly with the synergies," says Bethune. 

Aside from the synergies, development costs and the Australian dollar are falling so a brownfield expansion might not be high cost, he adds.

Globally, delays and cancellations of proposed LNG projects will trigger supply tightness around 2019-20, leaving Shell well positioned to take advantage, says Singapore-based consultancy Tri-Zen.

Aside from assets in Australia and East Africa, BG is the second-largest biggest gas producer in Trinidad and Tobago and a significant shareholder in the 15m t/y Atlantic LNG export scheme. Shell will hold 60% equity in the LNG project following its takeover of Repsol's LNG business last year and its merger with BG. 

But, given the boost to its LNG portfolio, it seems unlikely that Shell will push ahead with BG's Lake Charles export project and Elba Island liquefaction trains in the US. Each company has also been eyeing British Columbia for an LNG export terminal. Shell leads a consortium of companies planning the LNG Canada project in Kitimat, which could cost up to $40bn. While BG has proposed its own project near Prince Rupert, but late last year decided to pause work on it due to market uncertainty. It is likely BG's scheme will be sidelined.

Clearly Shell recognises that gas is primed to become increasingly important in the immediate future of energy. Gas, which when burnt for power produces half the carbon dioxide that coal does, will likely overtake coal as the world's second fuel by the late 2020s. 

Small and mid-scale LNG is also set to become increasingly dominant, creating new market opportunities in shipping, commercial road transport, railways and industry, particularly in Asia, reckons Tri-Zen. Innovation in the supply chain will be key and Shell is well placed for this. 

For Shell, this is the second gas-focused deal it has struck in as many years. In early 2014, it bought Repsol's LNG business for $4.1bn. Still, Shell is not alone betting on gas: BP, Total, Chevron and ExxonMobil are spending heavily on the fuel too. They are all hoping to position themselves to benefit from a trend in emerging markets, particularly in Asia, that favours gas over coal. 

The deal could potentially trigger acquisitions of other gas-focused companies the size of BG or maybe smaller. Among the potential targets are Woodside Petroleum and Santos of Australia, Noble Energy and US-based Devon Energy.

Santos shares have fallen the most, but it has the lowest quality assets, with Shell the only big company with excess gas that could bolster Santos' Gladstone LNG project in Australia, say analysts. 

Woodside could be an interesting target for Chevron while Australian junior Oil Search is good value with the best growth options. 

Oil Search along with US-listed InterOil are focused on the emerging gas province of Papua New Guinea right on Asia's doorstep. Both could prove attractive to ExxonMobil or Total, which already have footprints in the Pacific nation. 

Also in this section
Pemex debt strategy at risk of unravelling
30 July 2020
The Mexican firm had made some progress arresting its hefty debt pile, but the economic downturn and government obsession with upstream targets has started to take its toll
US domestic M&A sent reeling
28 July 2020
Deal-making across the oil and gas patch has slowed to a crawl despite a swathe of potential devalued assets and strained companies eager to divest
Oil firms ready to pick up the infrastructure divestment pace
13 July 2020
Pipelines, storage facilities and processing plants could replace non-advantaged production as prime candidates