Related Articles
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Starkly defined policy choices in US election

The race for the White House is shaping up to be a barn-burner after Republican Mitt Romney’s bold choice of running mate. PE examines the differences on energy policies and the impact on oil markets

Suddenly, the US presidential election has become a real contest. By choosing Tea Party darling Paul Ryan as his running mate, Republican challenger Mitt Romney has managed for the first time to cast the upcoming vote in stark shades of fiscal black and white. Social entitlements and taxes are the headline issues. But energy lurks ominously in the background, where pump prices are a proxy at the ballot box for the whole range of energy-related policies at home and abroad.  And it is the taxation, production and regulation of energy that clearly define the differences between Romney and Obama, apart from any division on foreign policy issues that have a direct bearing on North American oil

Also in this section
Venezuela going for broke
16 January 2018
The Maduro government wants a new deal on its debt. Things are going to get messy
Iraqi Kurdistan sinking fast
11 January 2018
The future of the KRI's oil sector is uncertain, with the federal government determined to bring all the country's production and exports back under its wing
Iraqi Kurdistan's wrong turn
11 January 2018
Burdened by political and economic crises at home, the autonomous region faces difficult talks with a newly confident federal government in Baghdad