Upfront science cuts dry-well odds

31 March 2011

Although advanced upstream technologies are expensive, early adopters significantly reduce the risk of drilling a dry hole, writes Anne Feltus

AS NORTH America's upstream focus has shifted to unconventional reservoirs, well costs have soared. Although cutting-edge technology, deployed early in the development of a well, can cut those costs dramatically and increase the chances of success, operators are often reluctant to use it.

One reason, quite simply, is that engineers have been trained to contain costs and advanced technology is expensive, says Lyle Lehman, sales, marketing and principal project manager of Houston-based StrataGen Engineering, a reservoir-engineering and -fracturing consulting firm. Lehman describes an engineer as an "accountant who understands a lot more science. When you take the principles and practices tests to become an engineer, you look at economic outcomes," he explains. "That's accounting, or finance."

A widely accepted resource model has also discouraged the use of costly technology by encouraging operators to drill multiple relatively inexpensive wells in hopes of finding a few easy-to-produce plays. Devised in 1979 by...



Only subscribers have complete access to Petroleum Economist, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 7 days access to Petroleum Economist (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe now


Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.


Click here to subscribe

Take a Free Trial


Please take a free 7 day trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Click here for a free trial

Related Articles






RESOURCES



Latest issue: May 2012

Japan’s bitter pill

The Japanese government has declared two reactors safe to restart. Now it must convince a traumatised Japanese public that nuclear remains the best route to recovery.


View online now